Friday, March 31, 2017
Monday, March 20, 2017
Style of Appropriation
There are a lot of APS ready to let you appropriate an image which will allow you to take a photo and put in the face.
If your skin tones are the same it may work. However it usually looks funny.
Here are the steps that I would take in Photoshop instead.
First take a photo that will have the same face angle.
Crop it as close as possible. If I need hands I usually will take some photos of feet and arms as well.
I just may want a more interesting face.
First on my original I will copy the hair. Put it on a separate layer.
After copying hair (Making sure it is on it's own layer) I erased the head.
Going back to the puppy photo, I went to image, adjust and matched the color to the painting.
As you see it is much bluer.
Next I resized the face to approximately the right size.
Making the background transparent so I could see the relationship I
rotated the image.
I start erasing the large unwanted parts of the photo.
It is much easier to do fine erase when you zoom in 200%.
Here I went to the hat, hair and erased unwanted areas.
Bu turning off the face I refined the hat more.
Here I copied part of the background to make up for
the hole above the head.
This will work but needs some work to refine it.
By adding a layer of black I am able to see better to erase more clearly.
Here I am using a father erase tool to make the fur realistic.
I moved the face down and need to redo some of the parts around the necklace.
Here I added a section around the hat.
The background hole is the biggest problem, I use the state tool to blend it in.Then I used a dry brush and a pastel filter on the dog. I do the same to the small background as drybrush.
I add the same filter to the painting, but fade it. After flattening the image, I play a little more with the background hole until I am satisfied.
The finished painting.
Write Title Here
How to Post Your Artwork --General Blog Page or Painting Page
Short Version1. Describe Intent
2. Describe Outcome
3. Describe Elements and Principles
Long Version - Must Do Two Of These-this semester.
Describe the piece thoroughly.
Tell me the title of the artwork, its size, when it
was created, and what medium was
used to make it. What is the subject
matter? What is the content? Is there hidden meaning, a subtext? What do you think the piece means? Describe every detail of what the artwork
looks like and what it is trying to say.
Is the piece representational, abstract or non-representational? What function of art does it seem to
fulfill? Are there
people in the picture, or animals or machinery?
Is the action in the foreground, the middle ground or the background?
What is happening in the rest of piece?
Tell me what elements of design are
present and how they are used. Line,
color, shape, light, space, time, motion, texture; are these actual or
implied? What colors were used? Is the scheme monochromatic, analogous or
complementary? What are the primary
shapes, and are some formed by groups of smaller figures or shapes? How is light shown? What are the values and gradations in the
piece and how are they created? How does
the work imply depth, if it is 2-dimensional?
Does the piece use linear perspective - 1pt or 2 pt? Overlap?
Vertical placement? Diminishing
size? Hierarchical proportioning? Aerial perspective? Is the passage of time depicted? How?
Is motion depicted? How is that
accomplished? Is the medium actually
textured, or is texture implied? How is
that done, and is it successful? Do the
shiny things look shiny, and rough things look rough, etc? Tell me what principles of design are used to
form the composition of the piece. What
elements are held constant to create unity, and what elements are varied to
create variety? How is rhythm
created? Is the balance symmetrical,
asymmetrical or radial? How can you
tell? Is the artwork scaled correctly,
and is it in proportion to itself? What
parts are not to scale or are out of proportion? How can you tell? What are the focal points and how are they
formed?
What art movement does the artwork
belong to? Does it belong to a
particular stylistic movement?
Did it stretch the boundaries of art in its time? How did it do that?
What is your emotional and
intellectual response to the artwork?
What does it remind you of, and what does it make you feel? Where does this work fit into the history of
art? Does it remind you of any others
you have seen, and in what way? Can you
make any connection between this piece and others? Is there anything about your background
that influenced the direction of this work?
Is there anything about his or your background that would influence others reaction to this work? What are the
characteristics of the culture from which it emerges, and how does the work
reflect those characteristics? Does the
work seem well crafted? If so (or if
not), does it matter? What feelings,
memories or associations does this work evoke in you? Does it make you feel happy, angry, sad,
frightened, disgusted, uplifted, inspired, depressed? Will others feel any sense of kinship
with the with this work? Do you like it? Why or why not? Could you live with this art in your house?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)